PHARMA-NATION

Updated: Dec 6, 2020

"You have the Vaccine Act of 86.  Now you have a project that has no liability so they have no incentive to make it safe.  Not only that they don’t have to test it and in fact they have an incentive not to test it because the only way you can get sued under the Vaccine Act is if you can show that the company knew of an injury and didn’t list it on the manufacturer’s insert.

So there’s an incentive to know as little about the product as possible.  And, you can’t sue them, and there’s no market force that keeps them in check.  Because you can say that the vaccine is mandated for 78 million kids.  And, so the industry got together and manufacturers said, holy cow, now we have a product that has no liability, and that’s the biggest cost for drugs.  So they said, number one, we don’t have to test it, that’s a huge cost avoided.  Number two, there’s no liability and that’s the biggest cost avoided.  Number three, there’s no marketing or advertising costs, because it’s mandated.  So it’s just like printing money." - JFK



In the next few days, the FDA will likely approve the Emergency Use Authorization for Moderna's distribution of its "investigational mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2".

This means that Moderna is basically asking the FDA to "approve" their "investigational vaccine" without having to go through the standard safety procedures and timeline. According to the FDA, EUA authorization is justified in times when it will

"allow [the] FDA to help strengthen the nation’s public health protections against *CBRN threats by facilitating the availability and use of MCMs needed during public health emergencies."

*CBRN = Chemical, Biological, Radiological

"Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the FDA Commissioner may allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."

To date there have been no mRNA vaccines licensed for use in humans.


A vaccine the public is accustomed to is an attenuated (inactivated or weakened) form of the virus.


Moderna's vaccine, mRNA-1273, among other vaccines currently being created by companies invested in "gene-editing" research, uses "snippets of a virus’s genetic material" in an attempt to potentially "build the proteins that trigger the body’s protective immune response".


The Phase III trial results explain the percentage of participants that experienced negative side-effects from the vaccine shot:

Solicited systemic adverse events were more common after the second vaccination and occurred in seven of 13 (54%) participants in the 25 µg group, all 15 (100%) participants in the 100 µg group and all 14 (100%) participants in the 250 µg group. After the second vaccination, fever was reported in none (0%) of the participants in the 25-μg group, 6 (40%) in the 100-μg group, and 8 (57%) in the 250-μg group. One of the fever events (maximum temperature 39.6°C) in the 250-μg group was graded severe.
The most commonly reported systemic adverse events following second vaccination at the 100 µg dose were fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia (53%), all of which were transient and mild or moderate in severity.
The Moderna vaccine results were analyzed by an independent data safety monitoring board, appointed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

https://www.drugs.com/history/mrna-1273.html


This is quite interesting, if not suspicious, because the National Institutes of Health (parent organization of Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID) funds and is "partnered with" the FDA.


Allegations have been made by Robert F Kennedy Jr.'s "Children's Health Defense" that the NIAID "will collect 50% of all royalties from a potential coronavirus vaccine"




The NIAID also partnered with Moderna in the development of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.


Not only was the vaccine developed in part by the NIAID, "The Moderna vaccine results were analyzed by an independent data safety monitoring board, appointed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health."


Some study participants even ended up contracting a "severe case" of Covid-19 from the vaccine itself, according to Forbes:

Two weeks after the second vaccine dose, researchers found 95 cases of infection in the study participants—90 cases in the placebo group and 5 cases in the group that received the vaccine. Of those infected, 11 went on to develop a severe case of Covid-19. All those who developed severe illness were in the placebo group.

So, to recap, The Moderna vaccine...


1. Developed in partnership with Dr. Fauci's NIAID

2. Funded by Dr. Fauci's NIAID/NIH

3. Vaccine trial was facilitated by Dr. Fauci's NIAID/NIH

4. Is awaiting approval from the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (to bypass safety procedures)--The FDA is funded and is in partnership with Dr. Fauci's NIAID

5. While Dr. Fauci and his NIAID is set to reap 50% of the earnings from the "emergency distribution" of Moderna's mRNA-1273 vaccine.

6. (Dr. Fauci is also the one telling the country and the world that everyone/as many as possible need to be vaccinated in order "to return to normal"...




Something's not right here...


See Also:


Moderna's stock soars after plan to file for emergency ... (marketwatch.com)


Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine may get emergency nod 24-72 hrs ... (yahoo.com)


Bobby Kennedy Jr. Claims Dr. Fauci and Gates Foundation Will Make Billions on Coronavirus Vaccine (thegatewaypundit.com)



19 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All