top of page

Importance of Understanding Virus Isolation

Updated: Oct 11, 2021

August 6, 2021 NickiLeaks Research What does it mean to isolate and purify a virus? Isolating a virus means, in simple terms, that you’ve found the virus in nature, likely in an animal host, and you’ve been able to successfully examine and identify that finding as the virus. There is a strict protocol for virus isolation—at least there used to be, up until the discovery of the “novel Covid-19 virus”...Here’s a short explanation of the historical, tested, and accepted way to isolate and purify a virus: “In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters, and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.” [Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s, Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI)] (click for link) The term “Isolation” is defined as “the action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.” (Oxford English Dictionary) By this very definition and no other factors, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. Why does it matter whether they’ve “isolated and purified” the virus? There are huge implications for this. Not having truly isolated the virus means they have never actually found the virus in nature.

This means that we don’t truly know that the virus even exists.

Now understand this: There are many who hear this and get very angry. But this is not an argument—it is provably true. The virus may exist, but no one has ever found it in nature. This is not my opinion, this is simply the truth, based on the evidence that has been produced by “the experts” thus far. Therefore, the virus itself is simply a computer-simulated, scientific postulation. There is no evidence that has ever been produced by anybody EVER, that proves that this virus exists. Period. Additionally, this “SARS-CoV-2 virus” is structurally almost exactly the same as the SARS virus of 2003. The only significant difference being transmissibility, by way of the ACE-2 binding receptor or Spike Protein

Coronavirus 2019-nCoV, able to enter and infect human cells’ ACE2 receptor via its spike protein.

Keep this in mind when you consider the next complicating factor: The way in which the argument on the origin of the virus has been extremely polarized as well as the way those who believed the “lab leak theory” were so heavily scrutinized and even demonized—WHY?? Come with me down this rabbit hole and decide for yourself… The most probable theory of the origin of the virus, based on the evidence that exists, is that the virus was altered via gain-of-function research paid for with funding grants from the NIH/NIAID at the Wuhan Lab. There is no doubt that Fauci’s organization was a key player in the funding of this controversial research and there are several grants I will provide that prove it. (The Wuhan Institute of Virology wasn’t the only lab performing gain-of-function research that was funded by the Fauci-led NIAID. For more information about specific gain-of-function research funded by Fauci’s NIAID, see my upcoming post, “Tracking GOF Research Prior to Covid 19 Outbreak” at Whether or not you believe Dr. Fauci did or didn’t know about the funding, the point is that there is a wealth of evidence that proves that the NIAID, the organization Fauci has run for decades, did, in fact, fund multiple gain of function research projects at the Level 4 Lab in Wuhan—to this there is no argument. Here’s a brief overview of some of the GOF contracts, to list a few (if there is significant interest in an exhaustive list, please reach out and I will provide everything I have): On January 6, 2014, Prof. Shi Zhengli received a US$665,000 grant from the National Institute of Health for a study named The Ecology of Bat Coronaviruses and the Risk of Future Coronavirus Emergence (NIAID R01 AI1 10964)and then four days later on January 10, 2014, an additional US$559,500 grant from the United States Agency of International Development for research study entitled, Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT 2_China (Project No. AID-OAA-A-14­00102). On October 31, 2019, Prof. Shi Zhengli had published a report entitled Filovirus-reactive antibodies in humans and bats in Northeast India imply zoonotic spillover, curiously funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the U.S. Biological Defense Research Directorate of the Naval Medical Research Center, and the Department of Atomic Energy of the Government of India and edited by a microbiologist employed by the U.S. Center for Disease Control. Of note is the fact that the Defense Threat Reduction Agency is an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense and is the official Combat Support Agency for countering weapons of mass destruction. (source) 12/12/2019 - “Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry”

“This work was supported by NIH grants R01AI089728 (to F.L), R01AI110700 (to F.L.), and R01AI139092 (to L.D. and F.L.).”


October 16, 2014

Statement on Funding Pause on Certain Types of Gain-of-Function Research

The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced(link is external) today that the U.S. government will undertake a deliberative process to assess the risks and benefits of certain gain-of-function (GOF) experiments with influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses in order to develop a new Federal policy regarding the funding of this research. During this deliberative process, U.S. government agencies will institute a pause on the funding of any new studies involving these experiments. For purposes of the deliberative process and this funding pause, “GOF studies” refers to scientific research that increases the ability of any of these infectious agents to cause disease by enhancing its pathogenicity or by increasing its transmissibility among mammals by respiratory droplets. NIH has funded such studies because they help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, enable the assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, and inform public health and preparedness efforts. These studies, however, also entail biosafety and biosecurity risks, which need to be understood better. NIH will be adhering to this funding pause until the robust and broad deliberative process described by the White House — including consultation with the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) and input from the National Research Council of the National Academies — is completed. During this pause, NIH will not provide new funding for any projects involving these experiments and encourages those currently conducting this type of work — whether federally funded or not — to voluntarily pause their research while the government determines how to proceed. Public involvement in this deliberative process is key, and the process is thus designed to be transparent, accessible, and open to input from all sources. Consultation with the NSABB, the first step in this process, will take place October 22, and I encourage you to follow these deliberations closely. Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. Director, National Institutes of Health

Consider this: Every mainstream media and “public health expert” is saying that they’ve “continuously and successfully isolated the virus”, but they neglect to inform us that they have changed the very definition of “virus isolation”.

Why? I would encourage you to do your own research and come to your own conclusion(s) but, as for me, the most likely answer is simple: to benefit themselves by deceiving us (the mass population or, as some in the highest orders like to refer to us, the “ignorant and profane”).

(To Be Continued...)




Sign up for my post notifications if you’d like to go with me on this journey! More to come very soon!

35 views0 comments


bottom of page